This is a subject that everyone appears to be arguing about in the mean time. All people attempting to next-guess Google’s steps – which they will NEVER do – and questioning whether reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is something truly worth carrying on.
‘Nuff with the speculation. In http://query.nytimes.com/search/sitesearch/?action=click&contentCollection®ion=TopBar&WT.nav=searchWidget&module=SearchSubmit&pgtype=Homepage#/유튜버 커뮤니티 this article’s the proof.
Google never like reciprocal connection directories and they will sniff 1 out a mile off. There was (detect the use of the past tense right here) a website link directory on my web page until eventually a short while ago, but I have now eliminated it, mainly because it had become as handy like a chocolate teapot.
While the principle front site of the location has retained it’s Google PageRank of PR5, in one in their last updates, Google relegated that Listing, which had also Earlier had a PR5, to some PR 0.
In the meantime, I'd not altered my linking composition that pointed to it. I'd not altered my insurance policies both: I did not link TO any PR0 web pages, held the volume of one-way links per page all the way down to a least and there were even textual content descriptions for every entry mentioned.
Google could inform what it absolutely was and acted as they noticed fit.
There's no position asking yourself or whining about it. They might and they are doing so in an effort to supply better final results to searchers. It is possible to like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you respectable listings, ranks or send out you any site visitors, their principles count.
My guidance: ignore *synthetic* reciprocal linking wholly. Enough time taken to keep up the directory, approve/disaprove submissions (primarily the latter, as the only folks still asking for back links are crappy PR0 sites and spammers) might be significantly better used.
When you need to Trade links with other 유튜브 동영상 홍보 web sites, ensure you achieve this in the natural way, by which I indicate write about the other web site in some way and location purely natural backlinks within the entire body text.
And look at just offering to receive. By which I indicate, url out to valuable factors for the edification or enjoyment of your people providing no thought to your fast usefulness of that link for you.
What goes about will appear all over. As soon as you are seen as practical, Other people will website link to you. You do then Get the links “reciprocated”, but it will not be from the identical persons to whom you connected.
That's the organic technique for linking that Google desires to see.
Tend not to, less than any instances, maintain something (in addition to inside navigation) that would appear like just a listing of hyperlinks / website link farm, because Google will discover it, gained’t like it and may penalize it.
Reciprocal linking, in the shape of lists or directories just designed for that extremely goal can not do anything to help you with Google (fairly the other, in reality) and for that reason, est mortuus.